Cheap Flights from Oslo to London — $19

More than 5 airlines operate flights from Oslo to London, including British Airways, Norwegian Air Shuttle, Ryanair, Scandinavian Airlines, and Skyview Airways Company Limiteddba Skyview. This is a popular route, so passengers can choose tickets based on budget and preferences. Ticket prices start from $19, and our service lets you instantly compare all options. The variety of offers simplifies planning: you can choose budget fares or more comfortable options with baggage included or extra services. We help you find the best deals so your trip is cost-efficient.

Oslo Gardermoen (OSL) is Norway’s main international gateway and typically serves as the country’s premium hub for both full-service carriers and major low-cost airlines. Located about 50 km northeast of the city center, it is usually the choice for long-haul and transfer traffic. The airport is connected by frequent express trains (35–40 minutes), regional trains and coaches (40–60 minutes), plus taxis and shared transfers; expect coach/train fares to be moderate compared with other European capitals. Pros: modern facilities, wide airline choice and reliable connections; cons: distance from central Oslo can add time and cost for transfers. Sandefjord/Torp (TRF) positions itself more as a budget-friendly, secondary airport for Oslo, typically used by low-cost carriers on leisure routes. It sits roughly 110 km south of Oslo, so travel to downtown can be significantly longer than from Gardermoen. Regular airport buses usually take about 1 hour 20 minutes to 1 hour 40 minutes depending on traffic, with train and taxi combinations also possible; fares are often lower than premium express services but can vary. Pros: lower-cost ticket options and less crowded terminals; cons: longer surface travel time to Oslo and fewer flight choices. Oslo Airport Moss Rygge (Rygge) previously served budget carriers and domestic flights but has had intermittent commercial operations and can be more seasonal in use. It is around 60 km south of central Oslo and is sometimes used for charter and low-cost services when operational. Ground options include shuttle buses and taxis taking roughly an hour or more to reach the city, with fares that can be relatively economical when services are running. Pros: potential lower fares and smaller terminals; cons: limited and irregular airline schedules and fewer amenities compared with Gardermoen. Oslo Fornebu (historical note) was the city’s main airport until Gardermoen opened; today there is no commercial service, but mentioning it helps clarify that Gardermoen is Oslo’s modern international hub. For travel planning, prioritize OSL for widest routing options and predictable transport links, consider TRF for budget itineraries if you can accommodate longer ground transfers, and check current schedules for Moss Rygge as its availability can change.

London is served by several airports with distinct roles. Heathrow is the city’s primary international hub, typically used by full-service carriers and long-haul flights; it can be pricier on average but offers the widest choice of routes. It sits about 15–20 miles west of central London, reachable by the Heathrow Express (15–20 minutes, higher fares), the Elizabeth Line or Piccadilly Line (35–60 minutes, moderate fares), and numerous taxis or coaches. Gatwick functions as a major international and low-cost gateway to the south, around 25–30 miles from the center and connected by the Gatwick Express (30 minutes) and regular trains or coaches. Stansted and Luton tend to host many budget airlines and charter services; they’re farther out (35–50 miles) with coach and rail links taking roughly 40–60+ minutes and often perceived as cheaper but less convenient. London City is a compact business-focused airport within the Docklands, only about 6 miles from central areas and commonly served by short commuter flights and corporate travelers; the Docklands Light Railway reaches the city in about 20–30 minutes. Pros vary: Heathrow and Gatwick are convenient for international connections and amenities, while Stansted, Luton and smaller fields can be cost-effective but involve longer transfers; London City is fastest for business districts but has limited airlines and destinations.