Cheap Flights from London to Murmansk Starting at $288

The route London — Murmansk is served by many carriers — 4 in total, including Azerbaijan Airlines, Pegasus Airlines, EasyJet, and Turkish Airlines. This gives passengers wide opportunities: from finding the lowest fare (from $288) to selecting flights by schedule or service class. Our service aggregates data from multiple booking systems so you can compare offers in one place. This saves time and money: no need to check dozens of sites — just pick the right option and book online.

Heathrow (LHR) is London’s primary international hub and a major gateway for long-haul and premium carriers; you’ll typically find flag carriers and full-service airlines alongside some international alliances. Located about 20–25 km west of central London, journey times by the Heathrow Express to Paddington are usually 15–20 minutes (farey range higher than tube services), while the Piccadilly Line takes roughly 45–60 minutes with lower fares; taxis can take 30–60 minutes depending on traffic. Pros: extensive route network, numerous lounges and transfer options. Cons: can be busy, security and transfer queues may be long and fares often reflect its hub status. Gatwick (LGW) serves as a major international and leisure airport with a mix of full-service and many low-cost carriers using its two terminals. It sits about 45 km south of central London; the Gatwick Express reaches Victoria in about 30 minutes with a premium fare, while regular Southern or Thameslink trains take 30–50 minutes at lower cost; road transfers vary from 45–90 minutes. Pros: good range of sun and European routes and fast rail link. Cons: fewer long-haul frequencies than Heathrow and domestic connections can be more split between operators. Stansted (STN) is typically positioned as a budget and short-haul-focused airport, frequented by low-cost carriers serving Europe and some seasonal destinations. Located approximately 50 km northeast of central London, Stansted Express trains run to Liverpool Street in about 45–50 minutes with mid-range fares; coaches can be cheaper but take 60–90 minutes, while car journeys vary with traffic. Pros: competitive fares on many European routes and streamlined terminal. Cons: fewer amenities than larger hubs and longer transfers to the city center. Luton (LTN) commonly operates as a value-oriented airport serving predominantly low-cost and leisure airlines on European and holiday routes. It lies roughly 50 km northwest of central London; transfers include shuttle trains and Thameslink services taking about 35–55 minutes to central stations, and coaches that can take 60–90 minutes with lower ticket prices. Pros: generally lower-cost flight options and compact terminal layout. Cons: transport connections can require transfers and peak travel times may extend journey durations. London City (LCY) functions as a compact, business-focused airport ideal for short-haul and corporate travelers, with a high proportion of business and regional carriers. It is situated within the Docklands, about 10 km east of the city center; DLR and Elizabeth Line connections typically take 15–25 minutes to central London with modest fares, and taxis are quick but can be pricier. Pros: close to Canary Wharf and central London, fast check-in and short transfers. Cons: runway and noise restrictions limit aircraft size and destination variety compared with larger airports.

Murmansk Airport (MMK) serves as the primary air gateway for Russia’s Arctic port city, functioning mainly as a regional and domestic hub with some seasonal and charter connections. Airlines operating here are typically Russian carriers and regional operators, with occasional flights from larger national airlines; fares can be perceived as mid-range for domestic routes but may rise seasonally. The airport lies roughly 24 km south of Murmansk city centre; ground options include taxis (about 25–40 minutes, depending on traffic), local bus shuttles and occasional airport transfer services, with fares usually modest for buses and higher for taxis. Pros: compact, straightforward layout and convenient for regional travel; cons: limited international routes and fewer passenger amenities than larger hubs.